Skip to content
Call Now: 615.455.3903
Search
Search
Close this search box.
Verify Insurance
WHAT WE TREAT
Subtance Use
Alcohol Addiction
Alcohol Rehab
Drug Addiction
Opioid Addiction
Mental Health
Grief and Loss Treatment
Anxiety Treatment
Depression Treatment
Trauma Treatment
PTSD Treatment
Bipolar Disorder Treatment
OCD Treatment
Personality Disorder Treatment
Intimacy Disorders
Sex Addiction Treatment
Porn Addiction Treatment
Codependency Treatment
Eating Disorders
Dual Diagnosis
OUR PROGRAMS
Residential
Women’s Residential Program
Women’s Residential Eating Disorders Program
Men’s Residential Program
Men’s Residential Intimacy Disorders Program
Outpatient
Music Row Recovery PHP
Music Row Recovery IOP
Alumni
Family Program
SERVICES
Modalities
Polyvagal Theory
Internal Family System
Narrative Therapy
TINSA®
Motivational Interviewing
EMDR
Cognitive Behavior Therapy
Dialectical Behavior Therapy
Brainspotting
Experiential Therapies
Wim Hof Breathwork
Wim Hof Ice Baths
AcuDetox
Equine Therapy
Pyschodrama Therapy
Drum Circle
Dance and Movement
Martial Arts Therapy
Music Therapy
Art Therapy
Trauma Informed Yoga
Mindfulness and Meditation
Labyrinth Therapy
ADMISSIONS
Admissions Overview
Intake and Assessment
Financial Philosophy
FAQ
ABOUT
About Us
Our Team
Why ILC
Treatment Philosophy
Core Values
Testimonials
Resources
Blog
Addiction Treatment Guide
Prof Referral Network
Careers
CONTACT US
Home
|
CE Evaluation: Michael Barta, PhD, LPC, CSAT-S – May 2020
CE Evaluation: Michael Barta, PhD, LPC, CSAT-S – May 2020
Name
*
First
Last
Email
*
Part 1: Learning Objectives
Please evaluate whether objectives were met. After this session, participants will be able to:
Experience a cutting edge neurobiological approach that will forever change the treatment of addiction.
*
Poorly/Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Excellent/Strongly agree
N/A
Understand how early environment and the lack of attachment and attunement play a crucial role in the formation of addiction.
*
Poorly/Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Excellent/Strongly agree
N/A
Part 2: Session Content
1. The session content was appropriate to my education, experience and/or licensure level.
*
Poorly/Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Excellent/Strongly agree
N/A
2. The session content was relevant to my practice.
*
Poorly/Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Excellent/Strongly agree
N/A
3. The session content was current.
*
Poorly/Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Excellent/Strongly agree
N/A
4. The session content was presented effectively.
*
Poorly/Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Excellent/Strongly agree
N/A
5. Handouts and/or teaching aids (if they were available) enhanced the session content.
*
Poorly/Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Excellent/Strongly agree
N/A
Part 3: Presenters
1. The presenter/s were knowledgeable about the session content.
*
Poorly/Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Excellent/Strongly agree
N/A
2. The presenter/s' presentation was clear and effective.
*
Poorly/Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Excellent/Strongly agree
N/A
3. The presenters were responsive to participants.
*
Poorly/Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Excellent/Strongly agree
N/A
4. The presenter/s used technology effectively (if applicable).
*
Poorly/Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Excellent/Strongly agree
N/A
Part 4: CE Administration
1. Questions or concerns were addressed effectively and in a timely manner.
*
Poorly/Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Excellent/Strongly agree
N/A
2. The location was suitable to the presentation.
*
Poorly/Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Excellent/Strongly agree
N/A
3. The facilities were conducive to learning.
*
Poorly/Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Excellent/Strongly agree
N/A
3. The facilities were conducive to learning.
*
Poorly/Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Excellent/Strongly agree
N/A
4. The instructions for requesting accommodations for a disability were clear.
*
Poorly/Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree
Excellent/Strongly agree
N/A
Any additional comments or feedback?
Δ